Connect with us


DCEC Investigates Magosi



DCEC Investigates Magosi

Spy chief probed for abuse of office

The Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime (DCEC) has opened yet another high profile corruption case, this time involving the Director General of the Directorate of Intelligence and Security Services, Peter Magosi.

The Voice can exclusively reveal that Magosi is being probed on allegations of abuse of office, a case with a potential to add more related charges as the web continues to grow.

The Director General of the DCEC, Brigadier Joseph Mathambo confirmed this to The Voice this week but would not disclose more details.

“My office has received such allegations; we will let you know once we have concluded everything,” Mathambo said.

However Information reaching this publication has indicated that Magosi attracted the attention of the corruption busting agency after DIS blocked a P1.8 billion water reticulation project and the Moshupa Primary hospital tenders, one of which was initially awarded to China state owned company, China Jiangsu for alleged security reasons.

Although China Jiangsu this week lost with costs, its last bid to seek an interdict of the two projects which were subsequently awarded to its rival, Zhentel, the Judge in his ruling stated that, “The third respondent (Ministry of Land Management Water and Sanitation Services) received a note from the Directorate of Intelligence and Security notifying it that the applicant (China Jiangsu) was a threat to national security and that the tender which the subject of dispute should not be awarded to it. In the first instance the note itself has no evidentiary value, as it is simply a letter from one government department addressed to another containing advice relating to the conduct of a bidder to an important government tender. It makes allegations of an extremely serious nature with no supportive documentation in affidavit form to substantiate the allegations.”

Commenting on the matter, a highly placed source close to the investigation who did not want to be named said, “It’s a whole web and the DCEC is still trying to put the pieces together. The question is why the DG (Magosi) would say that the Chinese company is a security threat whilst it is not?”

Meanwhile another insider at the Office of the President (OP) told The Voice that President Mokgweetsi Masisi was under pressure to clear his name with the Chinese Government, which has been tainted by Magosi’s accusation against China Jiangsu.

“The Chinese are not amused that their name has been tarnished by the government of Botswana when they recently gifted Masisi P60 million on behalf of the country. The President did confirm recently, speaking at a BDP candidate launch in Mogoditshane that the Chinese government had donated a few millions to assist Botswana,” claimed the insider.

The Maun Water Reticulation project worth P1.8 billion was withdrawn due to the DIS letter and instead awarded to Zhentai, a Chinese private owned company.

Three weeks ago, the spy chief had maintained in an interview that relations between Botswana and China remain intact despite the court ruling.

DCEC Investigates Magosi

“ What is happening between us and our counterpart in China I cannot discuss, but I can assure you that the judgment will not harm our relations,” Magosi had said and refused to comment any further on the case citing, “ privileged information.”

This week Magosi’s phone was not available to comment on his investigations by the DCEC.

Twitter: @sharonmathala

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


BDP quash UDC election petitions

•UDC’s petitions do not incriminate our candidates- BDP



Botswana Democratic Party has moved swiftly to counter a petition lodged by the Umbrella for Democratic Change before the courts seeking nullification of election results in some of the constituencies that were won by the ruling party.

The Voice is in possession of the notices to oppose by the BDP and the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) lawyers. The BDP has made known their intentions to have the UDC petitions quashed through points of law.

The BDP, through court papers served to the UDC this Wednesday, point out to certain irregularities and failure on the part of the UDC to meeting certain requirements to constitute a petition according to the Electoral Act.

In the court papers the BDP say that it is common knowledge that the UDC want the High Court to declare the constituencies void on the basis of corrupt practices, commission of illegal practices by the BDP, DISS and connivances of certain officers employed by the IEC.

“The petitions do not disclose facts necessary to enable the High Court to make a decision under Section (105) 1 of the Electoral Act. Without these material facts the High Court cannot void the election. The remedy is therefore not available to the petitioners,” read the court papers.

The BDP through their lawyers further state that the petitioners attribute the commission of the corrupt illegal practices to certain officers from the BDP being President Mokgweetsi Masisi, Satar Dada, Mpho Balopi, Dr Comma Serema, Banks Kentse and Moemedi Baikalafi aided by the DISS and certain officers from the IEC.

The BDP argues that the UDC failed to prove that the candidates in the disputed constituencies were engaged in “the commission of corrupt and illegal practices of BDP candidates or with the knowledge and or consent of any of their election or polling agents. The candidates have not been put on notice that the corrupt and illegal practices are attributed to them or their polling agents,”

The BDP also dismiss other petitioners citing that in other constituencies the UDC failed to give the other candidates including those of the Alliance for Progressives (AP) the chance to participate in the election petition. “They say they consulted Ndaba Gaolathe but he was not the candidate of the constituencies in question,” the BDP argue.

Turning to the affidavits made by Baikalafi, which the UDC heavily rely on, the BDP have also quashed his claims citing that they are not lawfully authenticated.

“Without a verifying affidavit, the petition in so far as they relate to ascertation attributed to Moemedi Baikalafi are a nulidity,” the papers read.

The main respondents, the IEC which is the body responsible for the running of the electoral process, on the other hand argue that their part in the petitions is not clearly stated by the UDC- as the law dictates.

They further argue that the IEC is not properly before court in respect that all remedies and reliefs that the petitioner seeks against the commission are incompetent. “This is more so the Petitioner challenges the elections that were conducted by the 1st respondent (the IEC).”

The UDC and its candidates are expected to respond to the BDP and thereafter a date will be set for arguments. The judges have said that the cases are a matter of urgency and should be dealt with and disposed of in 90 days (by next year February).

Continue Reading


Your daughter is not yours




A cheated husband who unknowingly raised his brother- in- law’s child as his own for three years ended the marriage in court this week and demanded a refund.

Gilbert Tom, on Wednesday divorced Mpale Tom nee Roberts after DNA tests results revealed that that their last-born child was not biologically related to Tom. They had been married for 15 years.

Tom, 50, became suspicious that his wife was cheating in 2009 when his brother in-law got into the habit of dropping off Mpale at their house after work.

Mpale, 43, fell pregnant in 2016 and when the baby was born, her husband was shocked that the baby was a spitting image of his older sister’s husband.

He then launched his own investigations in Mpale’s phone where he found messages that confirmed his suspicions
Some text messages revealed that Mpale was so much in love with her brother -in -law that she was even prepared to bewitch her husband’s sister to get her out of the way.

After finding out for certain that he was raising a child who was not his, Tom served Mpale with divorce papers.

She did not contest the divorce and readily confessed in court that Tom was not the father of her three-year-old daughter.

Divorce was granted and Judge Gabanagae ordered that the child be excluded from Tom’s responsibilities.

WIFE: Mpale

However Tom went further and demanded that his brother- in- law and his ex- wife pay him costs of raising a child that was not his, which are to be determined by court at a later date.

According to a relative who refused to be named for fear of victimization Mpale and her brother-in law worked together at a mine in Toteng village in 2013 and the family suspects that was when the disgraced couple started the affair.

She said coincidentally in 2016 the two found another job and moved to Francistown together.

“These people were too deep. We never thought they could do that to their partners and we thought they just related well as family members and little did we know that they were dating. This is painful for both families and it is very unfortunate that an innocent child has now been caught in the middle,” said the concerned relative

Continue Reading


Mokubilo man accused of rape



Letlhakane Police are investigating an incident in which a 28-year-old man allegedly raped a 34-year-old woman in the early hours of Monday morning (25 November).

The lady was on her way to Mokubilo Clinic – walking from the lands – when she reportedly met her armed attacker.

Taking over the narrative, Letlhakane Station Commander, Michael Maphephu told The Voice, “She reported that the suspect threatened to stab her with a sharpened iron rod.

“The suspect was arrested on the same day and will appear before court as soon as the Magistrate returns from sick leave,” said Maphephu, adding he could not release the accused’s name until he appears in court.

The worried police boss revealed this was the 89th rape case registered in his jurisdiction since the start of the year.

Maphephu added that most incidents involved women returning home in the evening after drinking or walking alone in the bush.

“I urge people to always walk in groups when they come from the bars or ask for company from trusted people when using bushy roads,” advised the top cop.

Continue Reading